Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering

McCue P, Shetty K. Health benefits of soy isoflavonoids and strategies for enhancement: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2004;44(5): 361-367.

Singh G, Dukariya G, Kumar A. Distribution, importance and diseases of soybean and common bean: A review. Biotechnol. J. Int. 2020;24(6):86-98.

Pagano MC, Miransari M. The importance of soybean production worldwide, in Abiotic and biotic stresses in soybean production. Elsevier. 2016;1-26.

Hasanuzzaman M, et al. Soybean production and environmental stresses, in Environmental stresses in soybean production. Elsevier. 2016;61-102.

Rajput M, et al. RNA interference and CRISPR/Cas gene editing for crop improvement: A paradigm shift towards sustainable agriculture. Plants. 2021; 10(9):1914.

Wu X, Kriz AJ, Sharp PA. Target specificity of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Quantitative Biology. 2014;2(2):59-70.

Asmamaw M, Zawdie B. Mechanism and applications of CRISPR/Cas-9-mediated genome editing. Biologics: Targets & Therapy. 2021;15:353.

Arora L, Narula A. Gene editing and crop improvement using CRISPR-Cas9 system. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8: 1932.

Gupta D, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing. Life Sciences. 2019;232:116636.

Mahfouz MM, Piatek A, Stewart Jr CN. Genome engineering via TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 systems: challenges and perspectives. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2014;12(8):1006-1014.

Ran F, et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nature Protocols. 2013;8(11):2281-2308.

Cai Y, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in soybean hairy roots. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136064.

Bao, A, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmSPL9 genes alters plant architecture in soybean. BMC Plant Biology. 2019;19(1):1-12.

Sun, Z, et al. Genetic improvement of the shoot architecture and yield in soya bean plants via the manipulation of GmmiR156b. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2019;17(1): 50-62.

Li, M, et al. Identification of traits contributing to high and stable yields in different soybean varieties across three Chinese latitudes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;10:1642.

Yang X, et al. Overexpression of GmGAMYB accelerates the transition to flowering and increases plant height in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:667242.

Hwang S, Lee TG. Integration of lodging resistance QTL in soybean. Scientific reports, 2019;9(1):1-11.

Cheng Q, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmLHY genes alters plant height and internode length in soybean. BMC Plant Biology. 2019. 19(1):1-11.

Zhang, M, et al,. Progress in soybean functional genomics over the past decade. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2022; 20(2):256.

Lu S, et al. Current overview on the genetic basis of key genes involved in soybean domestication. Abiotech. 2022:1-14.

Kara SR, Choudhuryb S, Chakrabortyc A. CRISPR/Cas9 for soybean improvement: A review.

Herman EM, et al. Genetic modification removes an immunodominant allergen from soybean. Plant Physiology. 2003; 132(1):36-43.

Sedivy EJ, Wu F, Hanzawa Y. Soybean domestication: the origin, genetic architecture and molecular bases. New Phytologist. 2017;214(2):539-553.

Chouard P. Vernalization and its relations to dormancy. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 1960;11(1):191-238.

Buzzell R. Inheritance of a soybean flowering response to fluorescent-daylength conditions. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology. 1971;13(4):703-707.

McBlain B, Bernard R. A new gene affecting the time of flowering and maturity in soybeans. Journal of Heredity. 1987;78(3):160-162.

Ray JD, et al. Genetic control of a long‐juvenile trait in soybean. Crop Science. 1995; 35(4):1001-1006.

Bonato ER, Vello NA. E6, a dominant gene conditioning early flowering and maturity in soybeans. Genetics and Molecular Biology. 1999; 22:229-232.

Cober ER, Voldeng HD. A new soybean maturity and photoperiod‐sensitivity locus linked to E1 and T. Crop Science. 2001;41(3):698-701.

Cober ER, Morrison MJ. Regulation of seed yield and agronomic characters by photoperiod sensitivity and growth habit genes in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2010; 120(5):1005-1012.

Kong F, et al. A new dominant gene E9 conditions early flowering and maturity in soybean. Crop Science. 2014;54(6):2529-2535.

Lu, S, et al. Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield. Nature Genetics. 2017;49(5):773-779.

Yue Y, et al. A single nucleotide deletion in J encoding GmELF3 confers long juvenility and is associated with adaption of tropic soybean. Molecular Plant. 2017;10(4):656-658.

Wang F, et al. A new dominant locus, E11, controls early flowering time and maturity in soybean. Molecular Breeding. 2019;39(5):1-13.

Xia Z, et al. Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(32):E2155- E2164.

Watanabe S, et al. A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics. 2011; 188(2):395-407.

Liu, B, et al. Genetic redundancy in soybean photoresponses associated with duplication of the phytochrome A gene. Genetics. 2008;180(2):995-1007.

Watanabe S, et al. Map-based cloning of the gene associated with the soybean maturity locus E3. Genetics. 2009;182(4): 1251-1262.

Kong, F, et al. Two coordinately regulated homologs of FLOWERING LOCUS T are involved in the control of photoperiodic flowering in soybean. Plant Physiology. 2010;154(3):1220-1231.

Cai Y, et al. CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmFT2a delays flowering time in soya bean. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2018;16(1):176-185.

Jacobs TB, et al. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnology. 2015; 15(1):1-10.

Li Z, et al. Cas9-guide RNA directed genome editing in soybean. Plant Physiology. 2015. 169(2):960-970.

Kanazashi Y, et al. Simultaneous site-directed mutagenesis of duplicated loci in soybean using a single guide RNA. Plant Cell Reports. 2018;37(3):553-563.

Do PT, et al. Demonstration of highly efficient dual gRNA CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the homeologous GmFAD2–1A and GmFAD2–1B genes to yield a high oleic, low linoleic and α-linolenic acid phenotype in soybean. BMC Plant Biology. 2019;19(1):1-14.

Li, Z, et al. Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of soybean LNK2 advances flowering time. The Crop Journal. 2021;9(4):767-776.

Nan H, et al. GmFT2a and GmFT5a redundantly and differentially regulate flowering through interaction with and upregulation of the bZIP transcription factor GmFDL19 in soybean. PloS one. 2014;9(5):e97669.

Cai Y, et al. Mutagenesis of GmFT2a and GmFT5a mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 contributes to expanding the regional adaptability of soybean. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020;18(1):298-309.

Subedi U, et al. The potential of genome editing for improving seed oil content and fatty acid composition in oilseed crops. Lipids. 2020;55(5):495-512.

Bortesi L, Fischer R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnology Advances. 2015; 33(1):41-52.

Villanueva-Mejia, D. and J.C. Alvarez, Genetic improvement of oilseed crops using modern biotechnology. Adv. Seed Biol, 2017:295-317.

Al Amin, N, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated targeted disruption of FAD2–2 microsomal omega-6 desaturases in soybean (Glycine max. L). BMC Biotechnology. 2019;19(1):1-10.

Ma X, et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Molecular Plant. 2015;8(8): 1274-1284.

Mikami M, Toki S, Endo M. Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Molecular Biology. 2015;88(6):561-572.

Singer SD, et al. Genetic engineering of lipid biosynthesis in seeds, in Biotechnology of crucifers. Springer. 2013;111-149.

Singer SD, Weselake RJ, Rahman H. Development and characterization of low α-linolenic acid Brassica oleracea lines bearing a novel mutation in a ‘class a’FATTY ACID DESATURASE 3gene. BMC Genetics. 2014;15(1):1-11.

Roesler K, et al. An improved variant of soybean type 1 diacylglycerol acyltransferase increases the oil content and decreases the soluble carbohydrate content of soybeans. Plant Physiology. 2016;171(2):878-893.

Chen G, et al. High‐performance variants of plant diacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 generated by directed evolution provide insights into structure-function. The Plant Journal. 2017;92(2):167-177.

Rodríguez-Leal D, et al. Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell. 2017;171(2):470-480. e8.

Wolter F, Schindele P, Puchta H. Plant breeding at the speed of light: the power of CRISPR/Cas to generate directed genetic diversity at multiple sites. BMC Plant Biology. 2019; 19(1):1-8.

Fan Y, et al. The soybean Rfg1 gene restricts nodulation by Sinorhizobium fredii USDA193. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:1548.

Herridge DF, Peoples MB, Boddey RM. Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant and Soil. 2008;311(1):1-18.

Wang L, et al. Use of CRISPR/Cas9 for symbiotic nitrogen fixation research in legumes. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. 2017;149:187-213.

Bai M, et al. Generation of a multiplex mutagenesis population via pooled CRISPR‐Cas9 in soya bean. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020;18(3):721-731.

Ren B, et al. Rhizobial tRNA-derived small RNAs are signal molecules regulating plant nodulation. Science. 2019;365(6456):919-922.

Li M, et al. GmNAC06, a NAC domain transcription factor enhances salt stress tolerance in soybean. Plant Molecular Biology. 2021;105(3):333-345.

Wei Y, et al. Quantitative response of soybean development and yield to drought stress during different growth stages in the Huaibei Plain, China. Agronomy. 2018;8(7):97.

Xiong R, et al. Root system architecture, physiological and transcriptional traits of soybean (Glycine max L.) in response to water deficit: A review. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021; 172(2):405-418.

Imran M, et al. Exogenous melatonin induces drought stress tolerance by promoting plant growth and antioxidant defense system of soybean plants. AoB Plants. 2021;13(4):plab026.

Sharma M, et al. Proteomics unravel the regulating role of salicylic acid in soybean under yield limiting drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;130:529-541.

Mahajan S, Tuteja N. Cold, salinity, and drought stresses an overview. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2005;444(2):139-158.

Dowling DK, Simmons LW. Reactive oxygen species as universal constraints in life-history evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;276(1663):1737-1745.

Nakagawa A, et al. Drought stress during soybean seed filling affects storage compounds through regulation of lipid and protein metabolism. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2018;40(6):1-8.

Egli D, Bruening W. Water stress, photosynthesis, seed sucrose levels and seed growth in soybean. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2004;142(1):1-8.

Seo JS, et al. Expression of the Arabidopsis AtMYB44 gene confers drought/salt-stress tolerance in transgenic soybean. Molecular Breeding. 2012; 29(3):601-608.

Raza G, Singh MB, Bhalla PL. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from commercial soybean cultivars. Plants. 2019;9(1):38.

Yuan L, et al. GmLCLs negatively regulates ABA perception and signalling genes in soybean leaf dehydration response. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2021; 44(2):412-424.

Yang C, et al. GmNAC8 acts as a positive regulator in soybean drought stress. Plant Science. 2020;293:110442.

Jamil A, et al. Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2011;30(5):435-458.

Hamayun M, et al. Exogenous gibberellic acid reprograms soybean to higher growth and salt stress tolerance. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010; 58(12):7226-7232.

Rasheed A, et al. Molecular tools and their applications in developing salt-tolerant soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars. Bioengineering. 2022;9(10):495.

Sun T, et al. A golgi-localized sodium/hydrogen exchanger positively regulates salt tolerance by maintaining higher K+/Na+ ratio in soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12:638340.

Li X, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 technique for temperature, drought, and salinity stress responses. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022;44(6):2664-2682.

Song JH, et al. Mutation of GmIPK1 gene using CRISPR/Cas9 reduced phytic acid content in soybean seeds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(18):10583.

Baek D, Chun HJ, Kim MC. Genome editing provides a valuable biological toolkit for soybean improvement. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 2022;1-12.

Sun Y, et al. Engineering herbicide-resistant rice plants through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination of acetolactate synthase. Molecular Plant. 2016;9(4):628-631.

Chen Y, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing system efficiently generates gain-of-function mutations in Arabidopsis. Sci China Life Sci. 2017;60(5):520-523.

Tian S, et al. Engineering herbicide-resistant watermelon variety through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing. Plant Cell Reports. 2018;37(9):1353- 1356.

Wu J, et al. Engineering herbicide‐resistant oilseed rape by CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated cytosine base‐editing. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020;18(9):1857.

Ali Z, et al. Efficient virus-mediated genome editing in plants using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Molecular Plant. 2015;8(8):1288-1291.

Bandara AY, et al. Dissecting the economic impact of soybean diseases in the United States over two decades. PloS one. 2020;15(4):e0231141.

Pompili V, et al. Reduced fire blight susceptibility in apple cultivars using a high‐efficiency CRISPR/Cas9‐FLP/FRT‐based gene editing system. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020; 18(3):845-858.

Pyott DE, Sheehan E, Molnar A. Engineering of CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated potyvirus resistance in transgene‐free Arabidopsis plants. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2016;17(8):1276-1288.

Ramakrishna W, et al. Structural analysis of the maize Rp1 complex reveals numerous sites and unexpected mechanisms of local rearrangement. The Plant Cell. 2002;14(12):3213-3223.

Wang, F, et al. Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922. PloS one. 2016; 11(4):e0154027.

Zhang P, et al. Multiplex CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated metabolic engineering increases soya bean isoflavone content and resistance to soya bean mosaic virus. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2020;18(6):1384-1395.

Nagy, E.D, et al, Novel disease resistance gene paralogs created by CRISPR/Cas9 in soy. Plant Cell Reports. 2021;40(6):1047-1058.

Liu JZ, Fang Y, Pang H. The current status of the soybean-soybean mosaic virus (SMV) pathosystem. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:1906.

Luo Y, et al. Development of a Csy4-processed guide RNA delivery system with soybean-infecting virus ALSV for genome editing. BMC Plant Biology. 2021;21(1):1-12.

Smith SM, Pryor AJ, Hulbert SH. Allelic and haplotypic diversity at the rp1 rust resistance locus of maize. Genetics. 2004;167(4):1939-1947.

Pivonia S, Yang X. Assessment of the potential year-round establishment of soybean rust throughout the world. Plant Disease. 2004;88(5):523-529.

Gao H, et al. Two classes of highly similar coiled coil-nucleotide binding-leucine rich repeat genes isolated from the Rps1-k locus encode Phytophthora resistance in soybean. Molecular Plant-microbe interactIons. 2005;18(10):1035-1045.

Chen X, et al. Generation of male-sterile soybean lines with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The Crop Journal. 2021;9(6):1270-1277.

Jianing G, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 applications for improvement of soybeans, current scenarios, and future perspectives. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2022;50(2):12678-12678.

Schmutz J, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature. 2010; 463(7278):178-183.

Fister AS, et al. Transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 machinery targeting TcNPR3 enhances defense response in Theobroma cacao. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:268.

Holubová K, et al. Modification of barley plant productivity through regulation of cytokinin content by reverse-genetics approaches. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:1676.

Chen L, et al. Improvement of soybean Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiency by adding glutamine and asparagine into the culture media. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(10):3039.

Svitashev S, et al. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nature Communications. 2016;7(1):1-7.

Foster AJ, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-mediated co-editing and counterselection in the rice blast fungus. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1-12.

Lowe K, et al. Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. The Plant Cell. 2016;28(9):1998-2015.

Campbell BW, et al. Functional analysis and development of a CRISPR/Cas9 allelic series for a CPR5 ortholog necessary for proper growth of soybean trichomes. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1):1-11.

Bao A, et al. Genome editing technology and application in soybean improvement. Oil Crop Science. 2020;5(1):31-40.

He R, et al. Expanding the range of CRISPR/Cas9-directed genome editing in soybean. aBIOTECH. 2022;3(2):89-98.

Biden S, Smyth SJ, Hudson D. The economic and environmental cost of delayed GM crop adoption: The case of Australia's GM canola moratorium. GM Crops & Food. 2018;9(1):13-20.

Xu H, et al. Progresses, challenges, and prospects of genome editing in soybean (Glycine max). Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:571138.

Curtin SJ, et al. Crispr/cas9 and talen s generate heritable mutations for genes involved in small rna processing of glycine max and medicago truncatula. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2018. 16(6):1125-1137.

Waltz E. With a free pass, CRISPR-edited plants reach market in record time. Nature Biotechnology. 2018;36(1):6-8.