Genetic Analysis of Drought Resistance in Maize Using Physiological, Morphological and Molecular Markers
Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering,
Drought is one of the limiting factors to annual maize production worldwide, as every year, about 15 to 20% of maize yield is lost to drought. Improvement in maize drought tolerance has always been one of the main objectives of a plant breeder. Measurement of physiological and morphological characters related to drought tolerance might prove very useful. The main objective of this study is to assess the markers, physiological and morphological traits, as well as molecular markers, which are considered as primary indices of drought tolerance mechanism. Maize, being a C4 crop, has a great mechanism of drought tolerance. Severe water stress may result in hampering photosynthesis, disturbing the overall metabolism, and finally leading to necrosis of the plant.
Similarly, other factors such as membrane stability, Chlorophyll contents, leaf area, delayed senescence, and rooting system are the most important markers to identify a crop plant in drought conditions. The final portion of this review discussed molecular markers and DNA marker-assisted selection which have become an amazing option for drought analysis in the maize crop. In this study at the Research Institute of Agrarian Business, about 113 maize lines were selected. With PCR using two Molecular Markers, dhnC397 and rspC1090, the polymorphic SNP sites of dhn1 and rsp41 were determined. As a result of this, using dhnC397, a 164-bp segment was found at the dhn1 site. For a genotype, carrying (CCA AGG) variants, PCR products were digested by using StyII restriction enzyme resulting in 02 bands, 131-bp and 33-bp. A similar approach was used for the identification of rsp41 gene polymorphism. Passing through the HpaII restriction enzyme, resulted in 02 bands, 225-bp and 61-bp. The alleles produced by using PCR and restriction enzymes are associated with drought resistance in maize. In this study, the alleles associated with drought resistance were identified in about 68 lines out of 113 by using these molecular markers. This concept can be used for breeding drought-resistant maize hybrids as well.
- Maize (Zea mays L.)
- drought resistance
- drought markers
- SNP polymorphism
How to Cite
Adewale SA, Akinwale RO, Fakorede MA, Badu-aprakuB. Genetic analysis of drought-adaptive traits at seedling stage in early-maturing maize inbred lines and field performance under stress conditions. Euphytica. 2018;214(8):1-8.
Blum A. Drought resistance–is it really a complex trait?. Functional Plant Biology. 2011;38(10):753-7.
QuarrieSA, Lazić-Jančić V, Kovačević D, Steed A, Pekić S. Bulk segregant analysis with molecular markers and its use for improving drought resistance in maize. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1999;50(337):1299-306.
ElbasyoniI, Saadalla M, baenzigerS, bockelmanH, morsyS. Cell membrane stability and association mapping for drought and heat tolerance in a worldwide wheat collection. Sustainability. 2017;9(9):1606.
Yang G, Rhodes D, Joly RJ. Effects of high temperature on membrane stability and chlorophyll fluorescence in glycinebetaine-deficient and glycinebetaine-containing maize lines. Functional Plant Biology. 1996;23(4):437-43.
Moussa HR, Abdel-azizSM. Comparative response of drought tolerant and drought sensitive maize genotypes to water stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2008;1(1):31-6.
Zhang L, Gao M, Hu J, Zhang X, wangK, Ashraf M. Modulation role of abscisic acid (aba) on growth, water relations and glycinebetaine metabolism in two maize (Zeamays l.) Cultivars under drought stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012;13(3):3189-202.
Setter TL, Yan J, Warburton M, Ribaut JM, XU Y, Sawkins M, et al. Genetic association mapping identifies single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes that affect abscisic acid levels in maize floral tissues during drought. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011;62(2):701-16.
Khayatnezhad M, Gholamin R. The effect of drought stress on leaf chlorophyll content and stress resistance in maize cultivars (Zeamays). African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2012;6(12):2844-8.
Gholamin R, Khayatnezhad M. The effect of end season drought stress on the chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield in maize cultivars. Scientific Research and Essays. 2011;6(25):5351-7.
VersluesPE, Sharp RE. Proline accumulation in maize (Zeamays l.) Primary roots at low water potentials. Ii. Metabolic source of increased proline deposition in the elongation zone. Plant Physiology. 1999;119(4):1349-60.
VoetbergGS, Sharp RE. Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials: iii. Role of increased proline deposition in osmotic adjustment. Plant Physiology. 1991;96(4):1125-30.
Xu Y. Molecular plant breeding. Cabi; 2010.
Smith JM. Macroevolution. Nature. 1981;289(5793):13-4.
Ali Z,Basra SM, Munir HA, Mahmood AR, Yousaf Sh. Mitigation of drought stress in maize by natural and synthetic growth promoters. J. Agric. Soc. Sci. 2011;7(2):56-62.
Saab IN, Sharp RE. Non-hydraulic signals from maize roots in drying soil: Inhibition of leaf elongation but not stomatal conductance. Planta. 1989;179(4):466-74.
AslamM, Maqbool MA, Cengiz R. Drought stress in maize (zeamaysl.) Effects, resistance mechanisms, global achievements and. Springer $briefs in Agriculture; 2015.
AkterN, Islam MR, Karim MA, Hossain T. Alleviation of drought stress in maize by exogenous application of gibberellic acid and cytokinin. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 2014;17(1):41-8.
AslamM, Zamir MS, Afzal I, Yaseen M, Mubeen M, Shoaib A. Drought stress, its effect on maize production and development of drought tolerance through potassium application. CercetăriAgronomiceînMoldova. 2013;46(2):99-114.
Herrero MP, Johnson RR. Drought stress and its effects on maize reproductive systems 1. Crop Science. 1981;21(1):105-10.
FellnerM, Ford ED, VolkenburghEV. Development of erect leaves in a modern maize hybrid is associated with reduced responsiveness to auxin and light of young seedlings in-vitro. Plant Signaling &Behavior. 2006;1(4):201-11.
GentinettaE, Ceppl D, Lepori C, Perico G, Motto M, Salamini F. A major gene for delayed senescence in maize. Pattern of photosynthates accumulation and inheritance. Plant Breeding. 1986;97(3):193-203.
ProchazkovaD, Sairam RK, Srivastava GC, Singh DV. Oxidative stress and antioxidant activity as the basis of senescence in maize leaves. Plant Science. 2001;161(4):765-71.
Gao Y, Xie Y, Jiang H, Wu B, NiuJ. Soil water status and root distribution across the rooting zone in maize with plastic film mulching. Field Crops Research. 2014;156:40-7.
PrysiazhniukL, Honcharov Y, Piskova O. Identification of drought-resistant maize lines by dna markers. Inbook of Proceedings International Gea (geo eco-eco agro) Conference Green Room Sessions. 2018;2018:88-93.
Liu S, HaoZ, Weng J, LI M, Zhang D, Pan G, Zhang S, LI X. Identification of two functional markers associated with drought resistance in maize. Molecular Breeding. 2015;35(1):1-0.
PrysiazhniukL, Honcharov Y, PiskovaO. Identification of drought-resistant maize lines by dna markers. Inbook of Proceedings International gea (geo eco-eco agro) Conference Green Room Sessions. 2018;2018:88-93.
Liu S, Hao Z, Weng J, LI M, Zhang D, Pan G, Zhang S, LI X. Identification of two functional markers associated with drought
Abstract View: 188 times
PDF Download: 87 times