Genetic Improvement Strategy of Indigenous Cattle Breeds: Effect of Cattle Crossbreeding Program on Their Reproductive Performances

Main Article Content

Teweldemedhn Mekonnen
Meseret Selam

Abstract

The aim of the review is to summarize the fragmented information on the effects of cattle crossbreeding on reproductive performance of cattle in different parts of the globe. The performance of animals depends not only on their genetic merit but also on other factors such as feeding, health management and other environmental factors. All breeds have strong and weak traits; there is no single best breed in all traits. Crossbreeding native cattle of Bosindicus type and exotic Bostaurus cattle is now a widely used method of improving reproduction of cattle in the tropics and subtropics. Crossbreeding is the reverse of inbreeding and is economically important practice in livestock breeding. Crossbreeding is an attractive option for livestock genetic improvement because of the quick outputs obtained. Crossbreeding is a crucial genetic improvement option for the lowly heritable traits of animals such as fertility of cows. Crossbreeding programme should respect the principle of “the right animal in the right place”. Under extensive management system of the tropics and subtropics, exotic cattle blood level inheritance should be from 50-62.5% for a maximum reproductive efficiency. Reproductive efficiency is a determinant factor for dairy and beef production efficiencies.Crossbreeding of highly productive and adapted breeds can improve overall performance. Heterosis is highest in F1 generation than in F2, F3 and F4 crossbred generations because the heterosis level is halved in each of the subsequent generations. Backcrossing reduces heterosis effects and thus reduces the advantages obtained from heterosis. However, it should be emphasized that heterosis cannot improve all traits, for example,carcass traits such as rib-eye area, marbling and meat tenderness. Calving interval affects total milk production of the dairy herd and the number of calves born, and is the most important index of reproductive performance.

Keywords:
Crossbreeding, age at first calving, calving interval, days open.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mekonnen, T., & Selam, M. (2020). Genetic Improvement Strategy of Indigenous Cattle Breeds: Effect of Cattle Crossbreeding Program on Their Reproductive Performances. Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, 3(1), 19-30. Retrieved from https://journalajbge.com/index.php/AJBGE/article/view/30072
Section
Review Article

References

Wilson RT. Crossbreeding of Cattle in Africa. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences. 2018;6(1):16-31.

Rege JEO, Aboagye GS, Tawah CL. Shorthorn cattle of West and Central Africa I. Origin, distribution, classification and population statistics. World Animal Review. 1994;78.

Wuletaw Z. Indigenous cattle genetic resource, their husbandry practices and breeding objectives in northwestern Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia; 2004.

Kiwuwa GH, Trail JCM, Kurtu MY, Worku G, Anderson FM, Durkin J. Crossbred dairy cattle productivity in Arsi Region, Ethiopia. 1983; ILCA Research Report No. 11, September International Livestock Centre for Africa; 1983.

Dematawewa CMB, Beger PJ. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305 day Yield, Fertility, and Survival in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 1998;81:2700-2709.

Shiferaw Y, Tenhagn BA, Bekana M, Kassa T. Reproductive performance of crossbred Dairy cows in different production systems in the central Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2003;25:551-561.

Hansen LB. Monitoring the worldwide genetic supply for dairy cattle with emphasis on managing crossbreeding and inbreeding. 8th World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; 2006.

Sørensen MK, Norberg E, Pedersen J, Christensen LG. Invited review: Crossbreeding in dairy cattle: A Danish perspective. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4116-4128.

Van Eenennaam A. Crossbreeding for the Commercial Beef Producer. eBEEF.org. 2017;1-6.

Olson TA. Crossbreeding Programs for Beef Cattle in Florida. Beef. 2001;1-31.

Simm G. Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep, 64-65, 70, 74-79, 83-95, 134-135, 201, 244-247, 354-355. Farming press. CABI International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK; 2000.

Heins BJ. Impact of an old technology on profitable dairying in the 21st Century. 4th Biennial WE Petersen Symposium; 2007.

Caraviello DZ. Crossbreeding Dairy Cattle. Reproduction and Genetics. 2004;610:1-6.

Lundgren A. Crossbreeding in dairy cattle. Bachelor Thesis, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, SLU; 2011.

Available:http://epsilon.slu.se

Gosey J. Crossbreeding the Forgotten Tool. Proceedings, the Range Beef Cow Symposium XIX December 6, 7 and 8, Rapid City, South Dakota; 2005.

Heins B, Hansen LB, De Vries A. Survival, lifetime production, and profitability of Normandex Holstein, Montbéliardex Holstein, and Scandinavian RedxHolstein crossbreds versus pure Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 2012;95:1011-1021.

FAO. Characterization and value addition to local breeds and their products in the Near East and North Africa-Regional Workshop, Rabat, Morocco, 19-21 November 2012. Animal Production and Health Report No. 3, Rome; 2014.

Walshe MJ, Grindle J, Nell A, Bachmanu M. Dairy development in sub-Saharan Africa- a study of issues and options. World Bank technical paper. No. 135. Africa technical department series; 1991.

Falvey L, Chanthalakkhan C. Smallholder dairying in the tropics. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya. 1999;462.

Wilson RT. Fit for purpose-the right animal in the right place. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2009a;41:1081-1090.

Lobago F, Bekana M, Gustafsson H, Kindahl H. Longitudinal observation on reproductive and lactation performances of smallholder crossbred dairy cattle in Fitche, Oromia region, central Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2007;39:395-403.

Mukasa-Mugrewa E. A review of Reproductive Performance of Female Bosindicus (Zebu) Cattle. ILCA Monograph N. 6, International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 1989.

Alberro M. Comparative performance of F1 Friesian x Zebu heifers in Ethiopia. Animal Production. 1983;37:247-252.

Khan UN, Olsson A, Philipsson J. Sahiwal herd development in Pakistan. Anim. Prod. Rural Deve. Proc. 6th Asian Association for Animal Production (AAAP), Annual Congress. Bangkok, Thailand. 1992;I.

McAllister AJ. Is crossbreeding the answer to questions of dairy breed utilization? Journal of. Dairy Science. 2002;85:2352-2357.

Bee JK, Msanga YN, Kavana PY. Lactation yield of crossbred dairy cattle under farmer management in Eastern coast of Africa, Tanzania. Journal of Dairy Science. 2006;353(6):0-5.

Wakchaure R, Ganguly S, Para PA, Kumar P, Kumar A, et al. Development of Crossbred Cattle in India: A Review International. J Emer Tech and Adv Engin. 2015;5:75.

Schaeffer LR, Burnside EB, Glover P, Fatehi J. Crossbreeding Results in Canadian Dairy Cattle for Production, Reproduction and Conformation. The Open Agriculture Journal. 2011;5:63-72.

Heins B, Hansen L, Seykora F. The California experience of mating Holstein cows to A.I. sires from the Swedish Red, Norwegian Red, Montbeliarde, and Normande breeds (Updated results of crossbreeding of dairy cattle. July 2007). University of Minnesota, department of animal science, 2007, dairy cattle research; crossbreeding of dairy cattle.
Available:http://www.ansci.umn.edu/research/California%20update%202007-kg.pdf

Mauro P, Riccardo DZ, Nicolás LV, Martino C. Crossbreeding effects in dairy cattle; PhD Dissertation: Genetica, Biodiversità, Biostatistica E BiotecnologieCiclo XXI, UniversitàDegliStudi Di Padova; 2009.

Cundiff LV, Szabo F, Gregory KE, Koch RM, Crouse JD. Breed comparisons in the germ plasm evaluation program at MARC. In: R.L. Hruska (ed.) Proceedings of the Beef Improvement Federation Meeting, May 26–29. Ashville, NC. 1993;124–136.

Marshall DM. Breed differences and genetic parameters for body composition traits in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 1994;72:2745-2755.

VanRaden, PM, Sanders AH. Economic merit of crossbred and purebred US dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2003;86:1036–1044.

Tegegne A, Gebremedhin B, Hoekstra D. Livestock input supply and service provision in Ethiopia: Challenges and opportunities for market-oriented development. IPMS Working Paper 20, Nairobi (Kenya): ILRI; 2010.

Udo HMJ, Aklilu HA, Phong LT, Bosma RH, Budisatria IGS, Patil BR, et al. Impact of intensification of different types of livestock production in smallholder crop‐livestock systems. Livest. Sci. 2011; 139:22‐29.

Boichard D, Bonaiti B, Barbat A. Effect of Holstein crossbreeding in the French black and white cattle population. Journal of Dairy Science. 1993;76(4):1157-1162.

Pilling D. Genetic impact assessment‐ summary of a debate. Anim. Genet. Resour. Information. 2007;41: 101‐107.

Gandini GC, Oldenbroek JK. Choosing the conservation strategy. In: Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal gen. resources. Oldenbroek J.K. (ed.). D‐DLO, Lelystad; 1999.

Samdup T, Udo HMJ, Eilers CHAM, Ibrahim MNM, Zijpp AJ. Crossbreeding and intensification of smallholder crop‐cattle farming systems in Bhutan. Livest. Sci. 2010;131:126‐134.

Marshal K. Optimizing the use of breed types in developing country livestock production systems: A neglected research area. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2014;14:1‐2.

Mulder HA, Bijma P. Effects of genotype × environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs. J. Anim. Sci. 2005;83: 49-61.

Hammack SP. Texas Adapted Genetic Strategies for Beef Cattle II: Genetic-Environmental Interaction. Agrilife Extention, Texas A and M System. No. E-187; 2009.

Hammami H, Rekik B, Gengler N. Genotype by environment interaction in dairy cattle. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2009;13(1):155-164.

Beyene K. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic effects for growth, milk yield and reproduction traits of crossbred (Bostaurus X Bosindicus) cattle in the wet and dry environment in Ethiopia. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University. Ithaca, New Zealand. 1992;235.

Van Pelt ML. Changes in the genetic level and the effects of age at first calving and milk production on survival during the first lactation over the last 25 years. Animal. 2016;1-8.

VanRaden PM, Sanders AH, Tooker ME, Miller RH, Norman HD, Kuhn MT, Wiggans GR. Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 2004;87:2285-2292.

Haile-Mariam M, Bowman PJ, Pryce JE. Genetic analyses of fertility and predictor traits in Holstein herds with low and high mean calving intervals and in Jersey herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2013; 96:655-667.

Clark DA, Caradus JR, Monaghan RM, Sharp P, Thorrold BS. Issues and options for future dairy farming in New Zealand. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 2007;50:2,203-221.

Heins BJ, Hansen LB, Seykora AJ. Calving difficulty and stillbirths of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbéliarde and Scandinavian Red. J. Dairy Sci. 2006; 89:2805-2810.

Tomar SS. Textbook of Animal Breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi; 2009.

Zelalem A, Biniam M, Tilaye D. Reproductive and lactation performance of crossbred dairy cows in Bishoftu, Ada`a district of East Shoa, Eastern Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, Sci. Technol. Arts Res. J. 2015; 4(4):113-119.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/star.v4i4.16
[ISSN: 2226-7522(Print) and 2305-3372(Online)]

Niraj Kumar, Alemayehu Eshetie, Berihu Gebrekidan, Endale Balcha Gurmu. Reproductive performance of indigenous and HF crossbred dairy cows in Gondar, Ethiopia. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS). 2014; 7(1):56-61.
[e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372]
Available:www.iosrjournals.org

Mulugeta A, Belayeneh A. Reproductive and lactation performances of dairy cows in Chacha Town and nearby selected kebeles, North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2013;1(1):008-017.
[ISSN 2329-9312]
Available:http://wsrjournals.org/journal/wjas

Robinson JJ, Ashworth CJ, Rooke JA, Mitchell LM, Mcevoy G. Nutrition and fertility in ruminant livestock. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2006;126:259-276.

Peters AR, Ball P. Reproduction in Cattle, 2nd Edition, Blackwell Press, Oxford, U.K; 1995.

Peters AR. Reproductive activity of the cow in the postpartum period.1. Factors affecting the length of the postpartum acyclic period. British Veterinary Journal. 1984140: 76-83.Radostits, O. M., Herd Health: Food Animal Production Medicine. 3rd Ed., Philadelphia. 2001;255-260.

Niraj Kumar, Berihu Gebrekidan, Nigus Abebe, Etsay Kebede. Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows under Farmers’ Management in and Around DebreZeit, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Production (EJVSAP). 2017;1(1):66-72.

Md. Akhtarul Islam, Md. Jalal Uddin Sarder, Syed SarwarJahan, Md. Hemayatul Islam. Evaluate the Productive and Reproductive Performance Considering Genotypes of Dairy Cows. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. Special Issue: Analytical and Microbiological Characterization of Antimicrobial Peptides. 2016;5(6-1):10-15.
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.s.2016050601.13

Metaxas L. The production performance of Holstein and Fleckvieh x Holstein cows in an intensive feeding system. MSc Thesis, Stellenbosch University; 2016.

Kefyalew A, Damitie K. the effect of crossbreeding on performance of crossbred dairy cows and indigenous cattle genetic resources in the North Western Amhara, Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports. 2015;8(5):1-7.
[Article no.JSRR.18508, ISSN: 2320-0227]
Available: www.sciencedomain.org

Demissu H, Fekadu B, Gemeda D. Early growth and reproductive performances of horro cattle and thier F1 Jersey Crosses in and around Horro-Guduru Livestock Production and Research Center, Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal. 2013;2(3):134-141.
Available: www.starjournal.org

Gebeyehu G, Asmare A, Asseged B. Reproductive performances of Fogera cattle and their Friesian crosses in Andassa ranch, Northwestern Ethiopia, Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2005;17(12).

Belay D, Werkineh G, Janses PJ. Reproductive and Productive Performance of Zebu X HoleisteinFresian (crossbred Dairy Cow% in Jimma Town, Oromia Ethiopia. 2012; Global Veterinarian CSA,: (Central Statistical Authority): Statistical Report in characterization of Agricultural household and land use, Part 1. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2008;8(1):67-72.

Nuraddis I, Reta H, Abidu M. Assessment of Problems Associated with Artificial Insemination Service in Selected Districts of Jimma Zone. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2014;5(2):37-44.
[ISSN: 2079-2166]

Nibret M. Study on reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows under small holder conditions in and around Gondar, North Western Ethiopia. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2012;3:38-41.

Alemshet B. Evaluation of the reproductive performance of cross bred dairy cows (HF x zebu) and artificial insemination service efficiency in and around Adigrat, Northern Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia; 2014.

Hunduma D. Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows under smallholder condition in Ethiopia. International Journal of Livestock Production. 2012;3(3):25-28.
DOI: 10.5897/IJLP11.055
[ISSN 2141-2448 ©2012 Academic Journals]
Available:http://www.academicjournals.org/IJLP

Mohamed-Khair A. Ahmed, Ahmed B. Teirab, Lutfi M.-A. Musa, Kurt J. Peters. Milk production and reproduction traits of different grades of Zebu x Friesian crossbreds under semi-arid conditions. 2007; Arch. Tierz., Dummerstorf 50 (2007) 3, 240-249, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin, Institute of Animal Sciences, Department of Animal Breeding in the Tropics and Subtropics, Berlin, Germany; 2007.

Suyadi S, Hakim L, Wahjuningsih S, Nugroho H. Reproductive performance of peranakanongole (PO)- and Limousin x PO Crossbred (Limpo) Cattle at Different Altitude Areas in East Java, Indonesia. J. Appl. Sci. & Agric. 2014;9(11):81-85.

Kollalpitiya KMPMB, Premaratne S, Peiris BL. Reproductive and Productive Performance of Up-Country Exotic Dairy Cattle Breeds of Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research. 2012;23(4):319-326.

Mebrahtom B, Hailemichael N. Comparative Evaluation on Productive and Reproductive Performance of Indigenous and Crossbred Dairy Cow Managed under Smallholder Farmers in Endamehoni District, Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 2016; 6(17):96-100.

Islam MS, Akhtar A, Hossain MA, Rahman MF, Hossain SS. Reproductive Performance and Repeatability Estimation of Some Traits of Crossbred Cows in Savar Dairy Farm. J. Environ. Sci. & Natural Resources. 2017;10(2):87–94.

Aynalem H, Workneh A, Noah K, Tadelle D, Azage T. Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran cattle for meat and milk production. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 26. Nairobi, Kenya, ILRI; 2011.

Roschinsky R, Kluszczynska M, Sölkner J, Puskur R, Wurzinger M. Smallholder experiences with dairy cattle crossbreeding in the tropics: From introduction to impact. Animal (2015), 9:1, pp 150–157 © The Animal Consortium; 2014.
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114002079

N’Goran KE, Gbodjo ZL, M’Bari KB, Loukou NE, DoumbiaL, Dosso R. Reproduction and production comparative analysis of F1n’dama X Montbéliarde And Holstein In The Dairy Station of Yamoussoukro In Côte D’ivoire. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2017;8(6):17821-17827.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2017.0806.0427

Djoko TD, Mbah DA, Mbanya JN, Kamga P, Awah NR, Bopelet M. Crossbreeding Cattle for Milk Production in the Tropics: Effects of Genetic and Environmental Factors on the Performance of Improved Genotypes on the Cameroon Western High Plateau. Revue Élev. Méd. vét. Pays trop. 2003;56(1-2):63-72.

Demeke S, Neser FWC, Schoeman SJ. Estimates of genetic parameters for boran, friesian and crosses of friesian and jersey with boran cattle in the Tropical Highlands of Ethiopia: Reproduction Traits. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2004;121: 57-65.

Siddiquee NU, Wadud MA, Bhuiyan MSA, Rahman AKMA, Amin MR, Bhuiyan AKFH. Suitability of temperate and tropical crossbred dairy cattle under peri-urban production System in Bangladesh. Animal Review. 2014;1(2):26-36.

Mureda E, Mekuriaw Z. Reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows in Eastern Lowlands of Ethiopia. Agricultural College, ATVET, Holleta, Ethiopia; 2007.

Ibrahim N, Ashebir A, Shiferaw M. Assessment of reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cattle (Holstein Frisian X Zebu) in Gondar town. Global Veterinary. 2011;6(6):561-566.

Duguma B, Kechero Y, Janssens GPJ. Productive and Reproductive Performance of Zebu X Holstein-Friesian Crossbred Dairy Cows in Jimma Town, Oromia, Ethiopia. Globalal Veterinaria, 2012;8(1): 67-72.
[ISSN 1992-6197]

Sisay ED. Productive and reproductive performance of dairy cows (Horro, Horro X Friesian and Horro X Jersey) at Bako agricultural research center, MSc. Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia; 2015.

Uddin MK, Wadud A, Begum D, Siddiki MSR, Rashid MH. Productive and Reproductive Performance of Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle in Comilla District. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 2008;37(1):39-43.

Megersa AA. Reproductive and productive performance of crossbred and indigenous dairy cattle under rural, peri-urban and urban dairy farming SystemsIn West Shoa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis, Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma, Ethiopia; 2016.

Kluszczynska M. Crossbreeding strategies for dairy cattle: Introduction, development and impact on smallholder farms in North Gondar, Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Vienna; 2012.

Kunbhar HK, Lasi AB, Memon AA. Reproductive performance of Crossbred cattle under intensive management condition. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2015;3(5s): 7-13.

ElaminKhM, Elebead RA, Mohammed SA, Musa AM. Some Productive and Reproductive Traits of Kenana × Friesian Cattle in Sudan. World's Vet. J. 2012; 2(4):49-53.